Mauro Andrade de Sousa and Alcides Antonio dos Santos . fidence interval ( Vuolo, ), a type B variance of half . Fundamentos da Teoria de Erros. Journal of Im-. munological Methods, 7. Vuolo JH (). Fundamentos da Teoria. dos Erros. 2nd edn. Editora Edgard Blü-. cher Ltda., São Paulo. 8. N.H. Medina, J.H. Vuolo. Instituto de Física da Universidade de São Paulo Centro de Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas (C6) da Universidade Vale do Rio dos .. [Vu96] J.R. Vuolo, Fundamentos da Teoria de Erros, 2nd Ed., Edgar Blücher.
|Published (Last):||1 July 2008|
|PDF File Size:||9.19 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.5 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Vuolo J. H. – Fundamentos da teoria de erros.pdf
Vuollo approximate distribution of estimates of variance components, Biometrics Bulletin 2 6: Bayesian assessment of uncertainty in metrology: The main method recognized by the metrologists for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty is de facto the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement ISO Guide.
Higher order corrections to the Welch-Satterthwaite formula, Metrologia 42 5: The evaluation of standard uncertainty in the presence of limited resolution of indicating devices, Measurement Science and Technology 8 4: Basic and general concepts and associated terms VIM.
A generalization of the Welch-Satterthwaite formula for use with correlated uncertainty components, Metrologia 44 5: Entretanto, algumas vezes por dw Does “WelchSatterthwaite”make a good uncertainty estimate? O primeiro termo da Eq.
On using the Monte Carlo method to calculate uncertainty intervals, Metrologia 43 6: Os valores simulados Eq. An Introduction to uncertainty in MeasurementNew York: Como mostrado nas Eqs. Cox and Harris ; Teooria et al.
* Metodologia Científica (FIS) – droqueh
Synthesis of variance, Psychometrika 6: Sebastian Yuri Cavalcanti Catunda. Difficulties arising from the representation of the measurand by a probability distribution, Measurement Science and Technology 21 1: No artigo de Esward et al. The evaluation of the uncertainty in knowing a directly measured quantity, Measurement Science and Technology 9 8: Evaluation of measurement uncertainty in the presence of combined random and analogue-todigital conversion errors, Measurement Science and Technology 11 9: Bayesian Statistics2nd edn, Oxford University Press.
How to cite this article. The obtained results show that it is necessary to evaluate the influence of the degree of errox linearity in order to estimate the measurement uncertainty before either method is chosen.
Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression teorka uncertainty in measurement. Evolution of the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, Metrologia Comparison of the linear and non linear methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty. Kalid II ; Gesner A. Bayesian evaluation of comparison data, Metrologia 43 4: We review the literature, in particular the main papers presenting these modern approaches.
Martins I ; Ricardo A.
On the meaning of coverage probabilities, Metrologia 46 6: Evaluation of uncertainty in measurements based on digitized data, Measurement 32 4: Jonh Wiley and Sons.
Evaluation of measurement uncertainty in analytical assays by means of Monte-Carlo simulation, Talanta 64 2: Coefficient of contribution to the combined standard uncertainty, Metrologia 43 4: Services on Demand Journal.
Evaluation of the uncertainty associated with a measurement result not corrected for systematic effects, Measurement Science and Technology 9 6: Bayesian inference from measurement information, Metrologia 36 3: A Bayesian approach to information fusion for evaluating the measurement uncertainty, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 57 3: Calculation of uncertainty in the presence of prior knowledge, Metrologia 44 2: