Wiki for Collaborative Studies of Arts, Media and Humanities. 9. Mai Transcript of “Die Gesellschaft des Spektakels” – Guy Debord. Gliederung Einführung Inhalt Aktualität der kritischen Theorie in Bezug auf die. : Die Gesellschaft des Spektakels () by Guy Debord and a great selection of similar New, Used and Collectible Books available.

Author: Kasar Zululmaran
Country: Argentina
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 13 February 2014
Pages: 356
PDF File Size: 11.43 Mb
ePub File Size: 13.64 Mb
ISBN: 228-4-21863-734-5
Downloads: 20656
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kazrak

This is why the spectator feels at home nowhere, because the spectacle is everywhere. Anonymity Concentration of media ownership Freedom of speech Media bias Privacy. Thesis makes this point, rhetorically:. Life magazine used one of the photographs as the cover of a brochure about the decade.

Guy Debord

The book cover of the edition is derived from a photograph by the Life magazine photographer, J. Part of the Politics series on. Images, Debord says, have supplanted genuine human interaction. Each thesis contains one paragraph.

“Die Gesellschaft des Spektakels” – Guy Debord by Anna Geltinger on Prezi

The work is a series of short theses in the form of aphorisms. Levin Dismantling the Spectacle: Socialism portal Communism portal Politics portal.

In Debord’s treatment, modern society forces culture to constantly re-appropriate or re-invent itself, copying and re-packaging old ideas. This page was last edited on 4 Novemberat Wright Millsauthor of White Collar: In the Situationist view, situations are actively created moments characterized by “a sense of dea of existence within a particular environment or ambience”.

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Retrieved from ” https: Cover of the first edition. The Spectacle is “affirmation of all human lifenamely social life, as gesellsdhaft appearance” from thesis 6: The meaning of words participates in the improvement.

Le sens des mots y participe. Works Can Dialectics Break Bricks? Consequently, social life moves further, leaving a state of “having” and proceeding into a state of “appearing”; namely the appearance of the image.


The externality of the spectacle in relation to the active man appears in the fact that his own gestures are no longer his but those of another who represents them to him. Print HardcoverPaperback. For the eponymous filmsee The Society of the Spectacle film. Whyteauthor of the bestseller The Organization Man. Image at Getty Images: Debord published a follow-up book Comments on the Society of the Spectacle in These religions arose on the soil of history, and established themselves there.

It embraces an author’s phrase, makes use of his expressions, erases a false idea, and replaces it with the right idea. Wikisource has original text related to this article: The Society of the Spectacle is a critique of contemporary consumer culture and commodity fetishismdealing with issues such as class alienationcultural homogenizationand mass media.

The Society of the Spectacle. Crowd manipulation Managing the news Media manipulation. In Chapter 8, “Negation and Consumption Within Culture”, Debord includes a critical analysis of the works of three American sociologists. Eyerman took a series of photographs of the audience wearing 3-D glasses. Boorstin ‘s The Imagearguing that Boorstin missed the concept of Spectacle. Being a star means specializing in the seemingly lived; the star is the object of identification with the shallow seeming life that has to compensate for the fragmented productive specializations which are actually lived.

When Debord says that “All that was once directly lived has become mere representation,” he is referring to the central importance of the image in contemporary society. Thus, Debord ‘s fourth thesis is: But there they still preserve themselves in radical opposition to history. The Second Decade, Because the notion of the spectacle involves real life being replaced by representations of real life, Society of the Spectacle is also concerned with the notion of authenticity versus inauthenticity, a theme which is revisited in Chapter 8, “Negation and Consumption within Culture”.


The spectacle is the inverted image of society in which relations between commodities have supplanted relations between people, in which “passive identification with the spectacle supplants genuine activity”. In his analysis of the spectacular society, Debord notes that the quality of life is impoverished, [6] with such a lack of authenticity that human perceptions are affected, and an attendant degradation of knowledge, which in turn hinders critical thought. Debord contends further that “the remains of religion and of the family the principal relic of the heritage of class power and the moral repression they assure, merge whenever the enjoyment of this world is affirmed—this world being nothing other than repressive pseudo-enjoyment.

Articles containing French-language text Webarchive template wayback links. Debord’s aim and proposal is “to wake up the spectator who has been drugged by spectacular images Council for Maintaining the Occupations.

In thesisDebord mentions some American sociologists who have described the general project of developed capitalism which “aims to recapture the fragmented worker as a personality well integrated in the group;” the examples mentioned by Debord are David Riesmanauthor of The Lonely Crowdand William H. Views Read Edit View history.

The Society of the Spectacle French: Debord discusses at length Daniel J. Debord traces the development of a modern society in which authentic social life has been replaced with its representation: Debord also draws an equivalence between the role of mass media marketing in the present and the role of religions in geseklschaft past.

The book is considered a seminal text for the Situationist movement.