Read 57 publications, and contact Larisa Avram on ResearchGate, the professional network for University of Bucharest | Unibuc · Department of English. English Syntax – The structure of Root Clauses – Autor(i): Larisa Avram – Editura: Oscar Print. Dr. Larisa Avram syntax, in other words, that syntax is a mirror of semantics? In some cases, the syntax of modal verbs and negation seems to reflect their.

Author: Gomuro Kajigami
Country: United Arab Emirates
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 7 April 2017
Pages: 175
PDF File Size: 1.35 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.1 Mb
ISBN: 903-5-86975-994-8
Downloads: 11744
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gugul

Linguists like Leech and Coates, however, do not adopt such a point of view, assuming that deontic might and could are to be regarded as the past tense forms of may and might.

English Syntax I

Mary can swim very well. One controversial fact about them is whether they encode tense information or modal information or both, for that matter.

The second important thing about modals is that they are not like the other auxiliaries have, be, do, namely the class of modals has some specific semantic and morpho-syntactic properties which delimit it within the class of auxiliary verbs Modals-a Distinct Morpho-Syntactic Class The morpho-syntactic properties that set modal verbs apart from lexical verbs can be separated into two sets: If there are any reasons why lariss cannot comply with what I am requiring, then talk with me about this at once.


In the same way: Another matter of controversy, this time among those linguists who consider them modals, has been whether they are deontic or epistemic. Year 3 Grammar Guide. Sytax slapped the frog into dizziness, and Wilma slapped the frog into dizziness too. According to us, all modal verbs occur under one single head MoodPand the different interpretations offered to modals deontic-epistemic are a result of the interplay between semantics and pragmatics.

IntroductionThe structure of simple sentencesThe structure and interpretation of the inflection phraseThe structure of the verb phraseIntransitive predicatesTransitive predicatesThe foloating nature of in transitivityThe structure of the noun phraseThe structure and the interpretation of the adjective phraseNoncanonical sentences in EnglishReferencesSubject index. Now the question is whether postulating such a notion is theoretically desirable.

Later, maybe we want to tell someone else what the More information. On this approach, modals come fully inflected from the lexicon and check their features against the corresponding abstract features of the functional heads. Volume 16 Issue 2 Octpp.

avrram A first tentative answer we could give would be to say that being modal means expressing modality. Volume 2 Issue 1 Janpp.

Télécharger livres par Larisa Avram – Free E-Book Download

You should not talk dirty to the parrot! Volume 15 Issue 2 Augpp. Instead, a modal of necessity coupled with p means that p is entailed by a certain domain. Instructions englihs easy to follow Exercises are carefully arranged.


Télécharger livres par Larisa Avram

A sentence More information. Southern USA, from Denison Cross-linguistic influence in bilingual development. He might surprise you one of these days!

The Handbook of English Linguistics. The plums that were in the ice box in the Sentence 2 What is a grammatical category?

English Syntax – The structure of Root Clauses – eBiblioPhil

On the nature of Romanian pronominal clitics. Something is rotten in the realm of negation and modals Internal vs. First and second language acquisition.

Active The school arranged a visit.

Volume 19 Issue 2 Decpp. Aspects of acquisition, maturity and loss, 13— International Journal of Linguistics 44 2. On the other hand, if the reporting verb is in the past tense, then usually we change the tenses in the reported speech: The examples she gives us are quite convincing: Just like the other auxiliaries, and unlike lexical verbs, modal verbs do not have an e-structure, and, hence, lzrisa do not theta-mark their arguments.